This year, the 10-year anniversary edition, I did not attend the SF salsa congress (read on to find out why). So, instead, I'll attempt a taboo topic that, as far as I know, has not been discussed by anyone publicly.
For years, I was wondering why salsa remains below the surface of the mainstream entertainment in this country. It seemed puzzling that such a popular trend would not be explored by the big business. Mambo fever of the 50s became a country-wide phenomenon. Why not salsa dancing? It remains a localized affair largely ignored by the mainstream. It is even more surprising now when ballroom dance shows spearheaded this style to the new heights. We cannot blame it all on ethnic origins: tango is as popular as ever and multiple tango shows and performers sell out theaters. Yet swing, the US originated dance, has never had a long sustained interest even after its brief limelight time thanks to a Gap commercial. Swing community is not interested in commercializing the dance, there are no groups, no shows or big congresses. West Coast swing is run like ballroom: mostly competitions and a few showcases. Lindyhoppers are happy to attend various camps and dance "exchanges" between cities organized by volunteers who also host visitors in their homes. The biggest camp that runs every summer in Sweden offers huge discounts to attendees from poor countries. Therefore there's no profit to be made and no big-time promoters.
Salsa is different. Congresses are a for-profit business and should follow business rules and ethics. Most small ventures fail and the rest remain small for various reasons, but often due to largely do-it-yourself entrepreneurs with little or no business know-how. They try to cut corners and save pennies thus bypassing opportunities for growth. They alienate partners, squabble about minor issues and shoot themselves in the foot by breaking promises and deals. It's been proven time and again that "the customer is always right" and even if you lose a little now, the happy client will come back and, most importantly, tell others.
Savvy and successful businessmen know that publicity can make or break your undertaking. It costs thousands, often millions, to advertise and companies set aside a huge portion of their budget for this purpose. They also know that independent opinions are best and word of mouth is priceless. Major cultural events follow the same rules. Film and music festivals court the media outlets and roll the red carpet for reporters who are willing to cover the event even though it's hard to calculate who or how many people read their reviews. When someone offers to cover the event, it's even better: free publicity!
Yet salsa doesn't seem to get much exposure in American media. No more ESPN broadcasts. So You Think You Can Dance fired Alex da Silva and never got anyone from the salsa world to replace him. Over the years, Dancing with the stars had only one salsa couple in one presentation. SF Jazz Festival used to have huge salsa nights at the Billy Graham Auditorium. There were Marc Anthony, Celia Cruz, Eddie Palmieri and other big stars + huge floor for dancing. I was covering the festival every year and talked organizers into issuing about 2 dozen free passes to dancers. Only 3 showed up. No more salsa dance nights at the festival. Swing dancers have had an outdoor dance floor at the Fillmore Jazz Festival for years, but no salsa until this year. Even Latin media is not covering SF salsa congress.
Is it any wonder that after writing for 35 years for various publications and media outlets, including CBC Radio Canada International, Radio Free Europe and Voice of America; after publishing and broadcasting 100s of articles and reviews; after covering Toronto and San Francisco film and jazz festivals as well as SF Latino Film Festival, I was denied accreditation to cover SF salsa congress this year. The main honcho, Ricardo Sanchez, was unsure if my reviews were helpful. So at the cost of nothing he lost the only reporter willing to sit through endless shows and competitions, make notations, interview participants, spend days after the congress writing, editing, posting and emailing while everyone else rested.
True, I cannot provide traffic stats from someone else's website where my articles are posted (some website owners keep their stats secret so even free contributors cannot find out how many people read their work). But even this blog that I do not promote and don't commercialize in any way, gets 100s of visitors from all over the world in spite of Google's reluctance to show it in searches due to lack of any sales. One can only imagine the 1000s that visit commercial sites!
SF congress website states in its About section that "National media, newspapers and magazines have all documented the extraordinary event that the SF Bay Area International Salsa Congress has become." Yet, there's not one quote, one name, one publication. Either it's not true or the promoter is not aware of its benefits. Even salsacrazy.com no longer promotes the congress.
Could it be due to salsa promoters' narrow-minded view unable to see the forest for the trees? My recent conversation with a businessman who dealt with salsa "venture capitalists" confirmed my suspicion.
When I first plunged into the salsa world, I was shocked to find out most performers and competitors must pay to participate and unless you're "in" you'll never know who pays and who gets paid. In other countries, if you're good enough people will pay you to see or hear you, if you're not ready - you don't perform, period. Oh sure, aspiring dancers yearning to strut their stuff are willing to pay for it, but is it fair to the audience? That's why SF salsa congress is centered on performers / competitors and their family and friends who come for support.
In this inherently closed-in model non-participants who come for dancing have to sit through the long shows and are made to feel like outsiders, especially when organisers' family members are being introduced. It's fine if you'd rather keep it "all in the family", but if you want to expand your reach and bring more people, this business model needs major tweaking and appeal to wider audiences. Without the necessary flexibility and ability to work with outside entities salsa will remain below the mainstream surface indefinitely in spite of its tremendous appeal.
DIP (dance in peace)
In my experience, promoters like Ricardo are clueless when it comes to effective marketing so its not a surprise they didn't accept your request. Of course, when they tell so many lies, its not like they are looking for any real coverage anyway.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, Ricardo told ABCNews 7 that he has 4000 people coming to his event this year.....there were barely 1000 people Saturday night. Similarly his personal statement in his brochure states they get 7000 people a year. That hasn't been the case in 5 years.
The San Francisco Salsa Congress has lost 1000 people a year for the last 4 years and its now dwindling dangerously low. (Not sure if this is because of Albert Torres deciding to pull out on the event or the economy.)
Either way, the event leaves a lot to be desired. Ricardo and Michelle are horrible MCs, and my sense is that the only reason the rest of the "dance team" community supports them is because they host the competitions what they all seem to covet. Without those event, Ricardo would be a pariah.
You know it's always been split between folks who attend to social dance, and the "performance" crowd--performers, family, friends, etc. When I used to attend the Congress the waiting to dance while sitting through the performances drove me crazy--er, Salsa Crazy!
ReplyDeleteKeep writing!
SF congress used to be one my favorites when i participated as a performer for the first seven years. It boasted a highly efficient group of volunteers who worked very diligently to make things run smoothly.
ReplyDeleteI missed out on the last two years and this year only went on Sunday night to watch the competition, so i can't comment on the overall quality of the congress in the recent years.
My single biggest complaint regarding SF congress ALWAYS has been abt MC'ing..!! For the sunday night competition, the duration of the whole event could've been cut in HALF (i kid u not), if they had a professional MC. And it's not that there is any dearth of local talent (DJ Fab Fred, DJ Frank, Isidiro.. to name a few). They can increase the overall efficiency by multi-fold.. Got to say that although DJ Boriqua was co-MC'ing with Ricardo, he was not given much room or material to do well. He could've done gone great just by himself.
Agree with Maya's key point in this blog that if they want to expand the scope of this congress to reach the mainstream audience, then they need to make it more streamlined, efficient and simply put, more 'appealing'. And since there isn't any evident effort from the organizers' side to do so, i am assuming that they are happy with the status quo..!
Thanks, Anonymous, for the tip about ABC's news clip. I found it online and it only confirmed my point: how could one fail to mention such a tremendous promotional opportunity in your own materials?! Even if it is reported by a namesake journalist Sanchez (another family member?;-)
ReplyDeleteI am the promoter of the Las Vegas Salsa Congress and here is my take on your article.
ReplyDeleteIt is easy to say ...spend money and it's ok to lose money... when it comes to the congress when your not the one spending the money.
I hold the Las Vegas Salsa Congress and it is extremley important to me to hold the event ON the Las Vegas strip so people get that Las Vegas feel when they come to town. That in turn means we have to pay a high premium in location, labor cost, audio video cost, ect to do so. I could easily hold the event in an off strip location and save tens of thousands of dollars, but my attendees wouldn't appreciate that.
Now to touch on your topic of why isnt salsa mainstream? For the last 6 years I've sent videos, promo packages, ect to every main TV station in the US, and water and liquor company trying to get sponsorship money in order to do more advertising on TV and radio, bring bigger bands, and better dancers that people want to see. The reason for me not getting to the right person is "its who you know" and I apprently don't know the guy to get me in the door.
Your comment of having to sit through mediocre shows. In Vegas we have about 25 shows a night. Some are our headliners and some are intermediate teams or couples trying to get experiance.. Now you say why not have all "headliners" right? The reason is I would lose my ass in all the air fare, pay to the artist, hotel, food, ect that I must pay to get them here to perform. I know I'm not going to make enough at the door to cover my costs so why in the world knowing that would I set myself up for failure? doesnt make sense. These dancers that pay a "performers fee" to dance on stage NEED that stage experiance in order to move to the next level to become headliners, and how do you gain that stage experiance if your not on stage? Also salsa in the United States has become watered down. Everyone is copying everyone, all the performers dress the same, and they all use the same music. The " headliners" that I bring to my event are leading the pack thats why I pay for them... NOT because they are in the " in" crowd!!!! I only pay for headliners that people are going to follow and want to see. I'm not biased at all!! I coudl care less about who my friends are or not I want to bring artist that I feel people will pay to see.. PERIOD!!
I think we are in the same boat as we scratch our heads and wonder why mainstream doesnt promote salsa more... believe me I work 12 months out of the year trying to make that happen, and the small salsa promoter doing an event in his home town... don't dog him out for doing so. If there are one or ten people that never danced salsa that go to that small event and fall in love with salsa then that promoter did his job.
Now allot of your article was directed towards the SF Salsa Congress which I have no affiliation with, but there are always corners we have to cut and a budget we have to follow to make these events happen. So if our events don't have Coke or Pepsi as a sponsor so we as prmoters can bring a show full of headliners or El Gran Combo it's not because we don't want or don't try to it's because we won't get enough people at the door to cover those cost and no sponsors as well to cover those cost.
If you have a solution to making salsa grow into mainstream I'm all ears. I think salsa deserves it's chance in the main spot light and would put away shows like " dancing with the stars" and ballroom shows like it. Ballroom dancers spin once and they scream. Salsa dancers spin 20 times and get no love. My email is below if you would like to make salsa grow. I'm not going to sign anonomys as I have no problem voicing my opinion. Thank you all for your support because without you paying at the door or those performers fees there is NO event.
Nate Strager
Las Vegas Salsa Congress
Sin City Salseros
salsero25@msn.com
Thank you for this great comment, Nate. To clarify:
ReplyDeleteI never advocated to spend money to lose money, this is a risky business and I would never do it myself. However, as mentioned above, most promoters outside the US and other dances do have a different and very successful model for their events.
Promoters should understand that the main attraction of congresses is dancing - not shows or bands that will help attendance, but not make or break it. I hate to be blunt and cut opportunities for musicians and dance stars, but social dances like salsa attract primarily people who want to... social dance. Everything else is icing on the cake.
IMO, besides already mentioned lack of business ethics and poor understanding of publicity and media role, mainstream media and entertainment industry will never pick up events on amateurish level in every way: organization, set-up, performances etc.
You do not have to give amateurs stage to practice their skills at the expense of spectators who will vote with their feet and wallet. Budding artists can hone their skills in studios and free shows. If you give the stage only to 1 or 2 headliners who need to be paid + a few top notch teams who don't, you limit your expenses, increase competition for quality, cut shows to bearable duration - half hour is plenty - and everyone wins, including dancers who must pay to perform.
Besides the fact that it's abhorrent to charge someone who worked hard, high quality just might attract the mainstream.
It would behoove promoters to look at different modus operandi. Change the model, get more people at the door, as you say, then the sponsors will come knocking.